This mosaic, almost complete, measures 35 m2. Through the study of the techniques and materials used one can measure the care with which it was realised. A levelling embankment supported a bed of pebbles (statumen) on which a first concrete covering (rudus) was poured, then lime mortar and terracotta debris were added. Restoration work has revealed trowel imprints used for spreading these concrete coverings, and even the print of a nailed sole. The ground surface (opus tesselatum), consists of tesserae, measuring on average 3 to 15 mm, fixed in a lime mixture. A preparatory design was made on the still humid nucleus. During restoration, traces of cords were found corresponding to the outline of the central panel. Rare event, traces of pigments were also found (preparatory design of a bird?), opening the possibility of preliminary intervention of a painter outlining the motif in the humid lime.
The tesserae were probably cut on the spot, with a cutter's knife, a small hammer (with a sharp edge) and a "taillote" (small projecting workbench). The materials used were coloured limestone (white, grey, black, ochre), opaque paste glass (blues, greens), terracotta (orange) and probably some marble fragments.
The setting of the tesserae probably started with the frame outlines and the coil patterns. The mosaic pavements were made before the wall-paintings which rested on them. After an unknown period of time, some of the more damaged figures had to be restored. Rather clumsy, these restorations nevertheless show the desire to remain faithful to the original. Traces of fire posterior to these ancient repairs suggest that the site was occupied for some time afterwards. The House was nonetheless abandoned during the 3rd century AD.
The tesserae were probably cut on the spot, with a cutter's knife, a small hammer (with a sharp edge) and a "taillote" (small projecting workbench). The materials used were coloured limestone (white, grey, black, ochre), opaque paste glass (blues, greens), terracotta (orange) and probably some marble fragments.
The setting of the tesserae probably started with the frame outlines and the coil patterns. The mosaic pavements were made before the wall-paintings which rested on them. After an unknown period of time, some of the more damaged figures had to be restored. Rather clumsy, these restorations nevertheless show the desire to remain faithful to the original. Traces of fire posterior to these ancient repairs suggest that the site was occupied for some time afterwards. The House was nonetheless abandoned during the 3rd century AD.












