Communiqué de presse
octobre 5, 2009
Contacts
Estelle Bénistant
chargée du développement culturel et de la communication
Inrap, direction interrégionale Grand-Est-Nord
03 87 16 41 54 - 06 74 10 26 80 - estelle.benistant@inrap.fr
Mahaut Tyrrell
chargée de communication médias
pôle partenariats et relations avec les médias
01 40 08 80 24 - mahaut.tyrrell@inrap.fr
chargée du développement culturel et de la communication
Inrap, direction interrégionale Grand-Est-Nord
03 87 16 41 54 - 06 74 10 26 80 - estelle.benistant@inrap.fr
Mahaut Tyrrell
chargée de communication médias
pôle partenariats et relations avec les médias
01 40 08 80 24 - mahaut.tyrrell@inrap.fr
An exceptional Neolithic site at Pont-sur-Seine
Publié le juillet 2, 2010 · Mis à jour le Février 8, 2011
Until the end of October 2009, a team of Inrap archaeologists will study a Neolithic site at Pont-sur-Seine. This site covers a surface of 4 hectares. The village uncovered there is exceptional for its occupation density, the monumental nature of its buildings and the style of some of its architecture, found here for the first time.
This discovery is unique in France, and perhaps Europe.
This discovery is unique in France, and perhaps Europe.

A first Middle Neolithic habitat (4700 to 4400 BC)
The archaeologists have uncovered post holes that show the plan of three circular houses over a surface of around 80 m2.. The interior space has the particularity of being separated into two parts by a partition of posts placed at one third of the distance of the space. Until now, a dozen constructions of this type were known in France, but this is the first time that several have been found at the same site.
The first datings based on pottery artifacts link this habitat to a vast sand-clay loam extraction pit measuring 480 m2. The materials extracted may have served in the construction of the buildings or perhaps the funerary or ritual mounds.
The first datings based on pottery artifacts link this habitat to a vast sand-clay loam extraction pit measuring 480 m2. The materials extracted may have served in the construction of the buildings or perhaps the funerary or ritual mounds.
A second very dense habitat from the end of the Neolithic
Around one thousand years later (3500 to 2500 BC), humans again chose this location to build their houses. Ten rectangular buildings with two naves, distributed over three zones of the site, have been identified. Their dimensions are variable: the biggest is twenty meters long and four wide and the smallest, ten meters long and three wide. There are currently few elements that could be used to precisely date these houses. Meanwhile, a comparison with a house excavated in northeastern France, which is very similar and has been radiocarbon dated, suggests that this ensemble can be attributed to the period between 3500 and 3000 BC. This attribution will likely be confirmed by the radiocarbon analyses currently being realized for Pont-sur-Seine. Such a high concentration of houses was until now unknown for this period.
Near this habitat, two enclosures, each containing buildings, were delimited by palisades.
Near this habitat, two enclosures, each containing buildings, were delimited by palisades.
A first enclosure formed by 500 posts
This enclosure is delimited by an oval shaped palisade, 165 meters long. More than 500, 2 meter high posts were necessary for its realization. During the excavation, the archaeologists uncovered pottery fragments and animal bones (cow, etc.). Their grouping together in a precise space indicates that this may be a ritual deposit. Inside the enclosure, two rectangular buildings, whose posts formed two naves, were discovered.
An enclosure with two monumental buildings and an original plan
The second enclosure isolates two constructions with an exceptional form and dimensions. Its palisade of 136 meters in circumference is supported against that of the first enclosure, indicating that this second space was created after the first.
An interruption in the palisade could correspond to the entrance of the enclosure. It is located in the axis of the entrance of the main building and would thus have contributed to the creation of an elaborate setting. In effect, outside the enclosure, the visitor would not have been able to appreciate the scale of the site since it was partially masked by the palisade, but as soon the visitor entered the enclosure, the stature of the buildings must have been immediately visible. These two buildings, or rather, monuments since this was probably a ritual space, have a nearly identical, trapezoidal morphology. Their size, on the other hand, is different. The smallest covers a surface of 280 m2, the largest nearly 900 m2. Their entrance is marked each time by a long narrowing to the east. Their corridor was delimited on either side by approximately 2 meter high palisades that must have resembled tall antennas.
The size of these two constructions made from perishable materials (wooden posts, mud bricks) is impressive. The foundations and the frame were specially conceived. In order to insure the stability and solidity of the buildings, wedging stones, most of quartzite sandstone, were placed in some of the postholes to reinforce them. This particular technique used to realize an elaborate architecture required the mobilization of a significant work force to construct the buildings. In effect, the first stones of this type could be found no closer than 3 kilometers from the site, beyond the alluvial valley.
Some of the structures inside the two buildings are also of particular interest to the archaeologists. For example, a pit around one meter deep, filled with several layers of stones, located in the center of the largest building. A similar pit was also discovered in the smaller building. Though it is too early to definitively interpret their function, these pits probably played a part in ritual activities and could support the hypothesis that these were ritual centers.
The plan of the buildings is also completely unknown in France and no elements of comparison have thus far been found in the European literature. Though it is still difficult to date these buildings, they seem to belong to the period between 3500 and 2500 BC. During this time, very large buildings were constructed in the north of France, in the Brittany and Centre-Ouest areas.
These two constructions are exceptional in France and probably in Europe. Such a high density of buildings (more than twenty-five) is little known for these periods. The plans of the constructions are rare and diverse. All of these elements, along with the structure of these occupations, represent a complex organization and make this ensemble a major site for our knowledge of humans in France during the Neolithic period.
An interruption in the palisade could correspond to the entrance of the enclosure. It is located in the axis of the entrance of the main building and would thus have contributed to the creation of an elaborate setting. In effect, outside the enclosure, the visitor would not have been able to appreciate the scale of the site since it was partially masked by the palisade, but as soon the visitor entered the enclosure, the stature of the buildings must have been immediately visible. These two buildings, or rather, monuments since this was probably a ritual space, have a nearly identical, trapezoidal morphology. Their size, on the other hand, is different. The smallest covers a surface of 280 m2, the largest nearly 900 m2. Their entrance is marked each time by a long narrowing to the east. Their corridor was delimited on either side by approximately 2 meter high palisades that must have resembled tall antennas.
The size of these two constructions made from perishable materials (wooden posts, mud bricks) is impressive. The foundations and the frame were specially conceived. In order to insure the stability and solidity of the buildings, wedging stones, most of quartzite sandstone, were placed in some of the postholes to reinforce them. This particular technique used to realize an elaborate architecture required the mobilization of a significant work force to construct the buildings. In effect, the first stones of this type could be found no closer than 3 kilometers from the site, beyond the alluvial valley.
Some of the structures inside the two buildings are also of particular interest to the archaeologists. For example, a pit around one meter deep, filled with several layers of stones, located in the center of the largest building. A similar pit was also discovered in the smaller building. Though it is too early to definitively interpret their function, these pits probably played a part in ritual activities and could support the hypothesis that these were ritual centers.
The plan of the buildings is also completely unknown in France and no elements of comparison have thus far been found in the European literature. Though it is still difficult to date these buildings, they seem to belong to the period between 3500 and 2500 BC. During this time, very large buildings were constructed in the north of France, in the Brittany and Centre-Ouest areas.
These two constructions are exceptional in France and probably in Europe. Such a high density of buildings (more than twenty-five) is little known for these periods. The plans of the constructions are rare and diverse. All of these elements, along with the structure of these occupations, represent a complex organization and make this ensemble a major site for our knowledge of humans in France during the Neolithic period.
Developer
Carrières Saint-Christophe
Curation
Service régional de l'archéologie (DRAC Champagne-Ardenne)
Site director
Vincent Desbrosse, Inrap

See images
-
Areal view of the two monumental buildings (300 and 900 m2) in their enclosure. On the right, the line left on the ground by the first enclosure is very visible© Frédéric Canon, Vertical photo / Inrap -
Areal view of the two monumental buildings in their enclosure© Frédéric Canon, Vertical photo / Inrap -
Areal close-up view of the 300 m2 monumental building© Frédéric Canon, Vertical photo / Inrap -
Areal view of a circular building© Frédéric Canon, Vertical photo / Inrap -
Principal entrance of the 300 m2 monumental building© 2009 Denis Gliksman / Inrap -
General view of the 300 m2 monumental building. In the foreground, the brown lines on the ground show the principal entrance corridor of this building. It consisted of a wooden palisade, 2 meters high© 2009 Denis Gliksman / Inrap -
Close-up view of the 300 m2 monumental building© 2009 Denis Gliksman / Inrap -
Excavation of the traces left by the wall of the 300 m2 building© 2009 Denis Gliksman / Inrap -
Two archaeologists study the walls of the 300 m2 building© 2009 Denis Gliksman / Inrap -
Closer-up view of the excavation of the walls of the 300 m2 building© 2009 Denis Gliksman / Inrap -
General view of the principal monumental building (900 m2). In the foreground, the brown lines on the ground show the entrance corridor of this building. This entrance consisted of a wooden palisade, 2 meters high© 2009 Denis Gliksman / Inrap -
Close-up view of the 900 m2 monumental building© 2009 Denis Gliksman / Inrap -
Excavation of the pit located in the center of the principal monumental building. It probably had a ritual function© 2009 Denis Gliksman / Inrap -
Palisade of the enclosure integrating the two monumental buildings© 2009 Denis Gliksman / Inrap -
Excavation of the entrance to the enclosure integrating the monumental buildings. The 2 meter high palisade is interrupted in the axis of the principal building. As soon as the visitor crossed this entrance, the stature of the buildings must have been immediately visible© 2009 Denis Gliksman / Inrap -
Lateral view of the two monumental buildings with the smallest (300 m2) in the foreground© 2009 Denis Gliksman / Inrap -
Lateral, diagonal view of the two monumental buildings with the smallest (300 m2) in the foreground© 2009 Denis Gliksman / Inrap -
View of the back of the monumental buildings in their enclosure© 2009 Denis Gliksman / Inrap -
View of the back of the monumental buildings with the traces of a circular building in the foreground© 2009 Denis Gliksman / Inrap -
Excavation of the probable ritual pit located in the center of the 900 m2 building. The black marks on the ground and the stones correspond to elements of the architecture of the building (pits and postholesl'architecture du bâtiment (fosses et trous de poteaux)© 2009 Denis Gliksman / Inrap -
Excavation of a pit. On the right, a posthole with wedging stones to insure the stability of a vertical post© 2009 Denis Gliksman / Inrap -
Excavation of potholes. The numerous wedging stones insure the stability of the posts and the solidity of the building frame© 2009 Denis Gliksman / Inrap -
View of an angle of the principal building in the process of excavation (pit and postholes with wedging stones)© 2009 Denis Gliksman / Inrap -
Traces of postholes delimiting a circular building constituted of wood and mud bricks. The posts supported the frame. This construction is typical of the Middle Neolithic (around 4500 BC). Only a dozen buildings of this type were previously known in France. Three were discovered at Pont-sur-Seine© 2009 Denis Gliksman / Inrap -
Polished flint axe head from the Neolithic period. It was discovered in a posthole of a building© 2009 Denis Gliksman / Inrap -
Flint blade from the Neolithic period. It was used to cut and scrape. It was discovered in the principal building of 900 m2© 2009 Denis Gliksman / Inrap -
Pot edge with a dotted decoration, characteristic of the Middle Neolithic (around 4500 BC)© 2009 Denis Gliksman / Inrap
- Télécharger le communiqué (pdf - <0.1 Mo)

